9:15 PM 9/18/2017 – Manafort FISA Report

Manafort FISA – Google Search

1 Share
Story image for Manafort FISA from CNN

Exclusive: US government wiretapped former Trump campaign …

CNN2 hours ago
A secret order authorized by the court that handles the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) began after Manafort became the subject of …
Making Sense of the Manafort FISA Report
TPM (blog)38 minutes ago
Media image for Manafort FISA from TPM (blog)

TPM (blog)

Media image for Manafort FISA from Washington Examiner

Washington Examiner

Media image for Manafort FISA from New York Daily News

New York Daily News

Media image for Manafort FISA from The Hill

The Hill

Media image for Manafort FISA from Business Insider

Business Insider

Media image for Manafort FISA from Bustle


<a href=”https://twitter.com/search/Manafort+FISA” rel=”nofollow”>https://twitter.com/search/Manafort+FISA</a>
Story image for Manafort FISA from Reuters

Trump campaign adviser was wiretapped under secret court orders …

Reuters36 minutes ago
Manafort became Trump’s campaign manager in June 2016 but was forced to … FISA warrants require the approval of top FBI and Justice …
Story image for Manafort FISA from Breitbart News

Analysis: Paul Manafort Wiretapping Raises New Questions About …

Breitbart News2 minutes ago
CNN did not report on the contents of the government basis for obtaining the FISA warrant against Manafort, whose name repeatedly appears …
Read the whole story
· · · ·

Making Sense of the Manafort FISA Report – TPM (blog)

1 Share

TPM (blog)
Making Sense of the Manafort FISA Report
TPM (blog)
Let’s also remember that letter former Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid wrote to James Comey after he appeared to reopen the Clinton emails investigation at the end of October. Quoting Reid:”In my communications with you and other top officials in the … 

Donald Trump may have incriminated himself on tape on Paul Manafort’s FISA wiretap 

1 Share

Earlier this year, Donald Trump asserted that the federal government had wiretapped him at Trump Tower during the campaign. This was a wildly incorrect false claim. But while Trump himself never was wiretapped, his reckless behavior after the election appears to have gotten him tied up in a wiretap after all – and in the process, he may have incriminated himself on tape.

This evening, CNN reported that there was a FISA wiretap warrant on Paul Manafort both before and after the election (link). It’s confirmed that the first warrant covered the period of the election after Manafort had departed the Trump campaign, when they continued to communicate by phone. The second warrant covered the period of time after Trump took office and continued to speak with Manafort by phone. This means that the Feds all but certainly have tapes of the conversations between Trump and Manafort. Those tapes are now in Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s hands.

Now it comes down to what the two men discussed during these wiretapped conversations. It’s known, for instance, that Manafort told Trump near the end of the election that he should head to Michigan, a state which is widely suspected of having been targeted by the Russians. If Manafort’s advice to Trump included an admission that Russia had paved the way for Trump’s surprise upset in the state, then Trump is on the hook for election collusion or worse. But the wiretapped conversations after the election may be more damning.

By the time Donald Trump and Paul Manafort were communicating in 2017, Trump was the president and Manafort was known to be under federal investigation. Their mutual decision to continue communicating suggests that they were conspiring to try to get themselves and each other off the hook. If so, Trump has nailed himself on obstruction and other charges.

The post Donald Trump may have incriminated himself on tape on Paul Manafort’s FISA wiretapappeared first on Palmer Report.

Trump legal team reflects their chaotic client – CNN

1 Share

Trump legal team reflects their chaotic client
Washington (CNN) Ty Cobb and other lawyers were supposed to impose discipline on an unruly White House as it confronted the investigation into President Donald Trump’s possible collusion with Russians in the 2016 election. It appears the opposite has …
Trump’s lawyer has a big mouth. Here’s what that tells us about Mueller’s probe.Washington Post
Mueller is homing in on a key White House player as he examines whether Trump obstructed justiceBusiness Insider
Can White House counsel McGahn claim client privilege in Mueller probe?Reuters
The Daily Caller –POLITICO Magazine
all 88 news articles »

The 2016 election was not a fluke – Washington Post

1 Share

Washington Post
The 2016 election was not a fluke
Washington Post
It is understandable that she would blame James B. Comey, Vladimir Putin and the media for damaging her prospects — and that she would play down her own strategic and tactical missteps. But take … The election never should have been close enough for 
Dissecting the election, Hillary Clinton sees dangers for democracyPBS NewsHourall 660 news articles »

Special counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia investigation sets a tough tone – Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

1 Share

Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
Special counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia investigation sets a tough tone
Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
The tactics reflect some of the hard-charging — and polarizing — personalities of Mueller’s team, seasoned prosecutors with experience investigating financial fraud, money laundering andorganized crime. Admirers of Andrew Weissmann, one of the team and more »

FBI wire tapped Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort: Report – Washington Examiner

1 Share
FBI wire tapped Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort: Report
Washington Examiner
The U.S. government wiretapped President Trump’s former campaign chairman Paul Manafort as a part of an investigation into work done by Washington consulting firms for Ukrainian politicians. CNN reported Monday multiple intelligence community officials …and more »

Next Page of Stories
Page 2

‪Paul Manafort was under FISA surveillance the entire time, and now Robert Mueller is about to indict him‬ 

1 Share

It turns out Paul Manafort has been under FISA surveillance the entire time. The Feds are now confirmed to have had a FISA warrant on Paul Manafort both during and after the election, monitoring his phone calls and communications. This includes Manafort’s calls to Donald Trump since he took office. It also includes potentially incriminating conversations between Manafort and Russia.

This bombshell comes by way of CNN, which is revealing this evening that the Feds have been targeting Paul Manafort since 2014 in relation to his involvement in the election of a Russian puppet in Ukraine (link). Some of the intercepted phone conversations took place between Manafort and Trump – meaning that the person occupying the office of President of the United States is associating with shady individuals so closely that he’s now been picked up on a wiretap. This is an incredible revelation. But there’s much more.

Here’s the part that’s about to put Paul Manafort’s back firmly against the wall. CNN is reporting that “Some of the intelligence collected includes communications that sparked concerns among investigators that Manafort had encouraged the Russians to help with the campaign.” Not shockingly, the New York Times is reporting this evening that Special Counsel Robert Mueller is about to indict Paul Manafort (link), which confirms just how far along his probe is progressing.

For what it’s worth, Palmer Report deduced four days ago that Robert Mueller was on the verge of indicting Paul Manafort (link). These new developments this evening serve to confirm that Mueller is indeed willing to back Manafort up firmly against a wall in order to get him to flip on Donald Trump. As has previously been widely reported, Mueller is working with the New York Attorney General to bring parallel state-level charges against Manafort that can’t be pardoned by Trump – meaning Manafort’s only way out is to give Trump up.

The post ‪Paul Manafort was under FISA surveillance the entire time, and now Robert Mueller is about to indict him‬ appeared first on Palmer Report.

Paul Manafort Reportedly Wiretapped By Feds

1 Share

The FBI is investigating Trump’s former campaign manager.

Man sentenced for trying to sell satellite secrets to Russia

1 Share
A California engineer who worked for a defense contractor has been sentenced to five years in prison for selling sensitive satellite information to an undercover FBI employee he thought was a Russian agent

Russia strikes Syrian Democratic Forces near Deir Ezzor

1 Share

Forces from the US-backed Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) were struck by Russian air assets near the Deir Ezzor frontline on September 16th, this according to a statement made by the Combined Joint Task Force –…

The post Russia strikes Syrian Democratic Forces near Deir Ezzor appeared first on Lima Charlie News.

Hacker who harassed leaders from CIA and FBI is sentenced to 5 … – Washington Post

1 Share

Washington Post
Hacker who harassed leaders from CIA and FBI is sentenced to 5 …
Washington Post
An aspiring hacker who harassed the CIA director and the national intelligence director, among others, in 2015 was sentenced Friday to five years in federal …and more »

Yes, James Comey may have cost Hillary Clinton the presidency — but we’ll never know for sure – Washington Post

1 Share

Washington Post
Yes, James Comey may have cost Hillary Clinton the presidency — but we’ll never know for sure
Washington Post
A pair of political science professors are out with a seemingly significant study: Despite Hillary Clinton saying she would be president if not for James BComey — and FiveThirtyEight, among others, lending credence to that claim — “We don’t think  

Next Page of Stories
Page 3

Trump’s lawyer has a big mouth. Here’s what that tells us about Mueller’s probe. – Washington Post

1 Share

Washington Post
Trump’s lawyer has a big mouth. Here’s what that tells us about Mueller’s probe.
Washington Post
… in that conversation indeed exist, they could well provide special counsel Robert S. Mueller III with crucial evidence about Trump’s thinking as Mueller investigates whether the president obstructed justice when he fired FBI Director James BComey.and more »

Russian forces struck a location “known to the Russians to contain Syrian Democratic Forces and Coalition advisers” near the eastern province of Deir al-Zour, causing injuries to U.S.-backed Kurdish-dominated S.D.F. fighters, according to a statement by Operation Inherent Resolve on Saturday. | Global Security News

1 Share


Russian forces struck a location “known to the Russians to contain Syrian Democratic Forces and Coalition advisers” near the eastern province of Deir al-Zour, causing injuries to U.S.-backed Kurdish-dominated S.D.F. fighters, according to a statement by Operation Inherent Resolve on Saturday.

US troops in Syria battle anti-Assad rebels once funded by the CIA

1 Share

US troops in SyriaAmerican troops deployed in Syria have exchanged fire with rebels that were until recently supported by the United States Central Intelligence Agency. In 2013, soon after the outbreak of the Syrian Civil War, the then-US President Barack Obama instructed the Central Intelligence Agency to provide covert support to fighters in Syria. Acting on the president’s directive, the CIA promptly joined forces with spy agencies from Britain, France, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, to assist fighters affiliated with the Free Syrian Army. At that time, Washington saw the Free Syrian Army and forces affiliated with it as ideologically moderate. It also agreed with the group’s main aim, which was to topple the regime of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.

Under the project, which was codenamed TIMBER SYCAMORE, CIA personnel trained Free Syrian Army fighters in irregular warfare, while also providing them with light weaponry including machine guns, sniper rifles and off-road vehicles. But on July 19 of this year, US President Donald Trump abruptly ended the CIA program, which he called “dangerous and wasteful”. It soon became apparent that many Free Syrian Army soldiers approached Turkey, seeking financial income and protection. By early August, there were reports from Syria that large groups of former Free Syrian Army troops were conducting raids in northern Syria in coordination with the Turkish military.

Early on Wednesday, a spokesman for the Combined Task Force Operation Inherent Resolve told reporters that US troops in Syria had come under fire by Turkish-commanded former Free Syrian Army units. The spokesman told reporters in Kuwait City that the rebels shot at US troops in the outskirts of Manbij, a northern Syrian city of about 70,000, located a few miles from the Turkish border. The American soldiers reportedly returned fire before seeking shelter from the assault. According to the US Pentagon, the Turkish government was promptly contacted by Inherent Resolve commanders, who described the incident as “not acceptable”. Washington alleges that its troops have come under fire “multiple times” in the past month. Some of the culprits are believed to be Turkish-controlled Syrian insurgents, including former members of the Free Syrian Army.

Turkey and the US are member states of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. But the two countries do not follow a common policy on Syria. The US Pentagon supports Kurdish insurgents in Syria, which Turkey claims are connected with Kurdish separatists inside Turkey. Washington’s official position on Kurdish separatists is that they engage in terrorism against the Turkish state.

► Author: Joseph Fitsanakis | Date: 30 August 2017 | Permalink


Read the whole story
· ·

Russian Strike Wounds Syrian Democratic Forces Troops > Operation Inherent Resolve > News Releases

1 Share

By CJTF-OIR | September 16, 2017

SOUTHWEST ASIA – At approximately 12:30 a.m. GMT Sept. 16, Russian forces struck a target east of the Euphrates River in Syria near Dayr Az Zawr, causing injuries to Coalition partner forces.

Russian munitions impacted a location known to the Russians to contain Syrian Democratic Forces and Coalition advisors. Several SDF fighters were wounded and received medical care as a result of the strike.

Multinational Coalition troops advising and assisting the SDF were present but not wounded as a result of the Russian strike. “Coalition officials are available and the de-confliction line with Russia is open 24 hours per day,” said Coalition commander Lt. Gen. Paul E. Funk II. “We put our full efforts into preventing unnecessary escalation among forces that share ISIS as our common enemy,” said Funk.

The Coalition and its partners remain committed to the defeat of ISIS and continued de-confliction with Russian officials. Coalition forces and partners always retain the right of self-defense.

Intelligence, Politicization, and the Russia Probe

1 Share

Editor’s Note: The incoming administration’s scorn for intelligence professionals is a matter of grave concern to many of us at LawfareI, for one, worry that the administration will conduct its foreign policy without understanding the dynamics of foreign governments, their attempts to mislead us, and emerging threats like cyber subversion. Joshua Rovner, a scholar of intelligence at American University, makes me even more concerned. He takes the long view, going beyond the potential for short-term policy catastrophe to explain the long tradition of policymaker suspicion of intelligence and the many potential negative consequences for the intelligence community.


In August, the Washington Post reported that intelligence officials are concerned about their new boss, given CIA Director Mike Pompeo’s political background and staunch support of Trump during the campaign. As a Republican representative from Kansas, Pompeo stood out in Congress for his relentless pressure to find a scandal in the Benghazi tragedy and to connect it with former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. Not satisfied with the House Benghazi Committee’s final report, he attached an addendum declaring that Clinton “misled the public” about the affair and “failed to lead.” Meanwhile he threw his support behind Trump, “a commander in chief who fearlessly puts America out in front.”

Pompeo is not the first politician to lead the CIA, but his relentless brand of politics and close ties to Trump have led to fears that he cannot remain impartial about the Russia probe. In particular, critics worry that he will inhibit the work of the Agency’s Mission Center for Counterintelligence, which may possess damaging information about Russia’s role in last year’s election. The Center is the Agency’s hub for tracking foreign intelligence efforts in the United States, and according to the Post, a conduit to the FBI. Pompeo reportedly ordered the Center to report to him directly, which makes sense given his commitment to track down leakers and the sensitivity of the issue. But some within the Agency worry that he could use his position to discourage it from pursuing the investigation at all.

[Pompeo’s] relentless brand of politics and close ties to Trump have led to fears that he cannot remain impartial about the Russia probe.

Concerns about Pompeo are not new. In February, the Post reported that he was asked to call reporters in an effort to dispute stories about connections between Trump associates and Russian intelligence operatives. While Pompeo never acknowledged doing so, his public comments about broader Russian influence operations are mild compared to releases from U.S. agencies. Before the election, a joint statement from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence and the Department of Homeland Security concluded that Russia had hacked emails from the Democratic National Committee in an effort to sway the outcome, and that “only Russia’s senior-most officials could have authorized these activities.” This January, a second assessment explained why the election was a serious escalation in Russia’s long-term effort to influence U.S. politics.

Pompeo agreed with these findings in his confirmation hearings, but more recently he has argued that Russia’s so-called “active measures” are nothing new. He turned heads at the Aspen Security Forumwhen asked whether Russia had interfered in the election. “Yeah, of course,” he said. “And the one before that, and the one before that, they have been at this a hell of a long time.” Some fear that this formulation is too dismissive. While Soviet active measures in the Cold War were mostly dismal failures, this episode appears to have been much more successful, and Russia’s technical sophistication in cyber-espionage means that old analogies are not really relevant to understanding the present threat.

To be fair, Pompeo’s comments have gone far beyond what Trump has been willing to acknowledge about Russian activities. At various times, the president has pinned the blame for the DNC hacks on Russia, China, and the DNC itself. His only consistent theme is that the problem of attribution is too hard to make a firm judgment. Pompeo has been much more critical of Russia, but his caveats, especially the repeated suggestion that last year’s events were nothing new, have some worried that he will lean in Trump’s direction as the investigation intensifies. In other areas he has willingly assumed the role of a policy advocate, rather than an impartial intelligence official. This is in keeping with his embrace of Trump during the election season.

All presidents have incentives to politicize intelligence. Intelligence agencies are particularly effective public-relations vehicles because they control secret information, and individuals tend to believe in secrets. In this case, Trump has obvious reason to use intelligence leaders to muddy the waters about what happened during the campaign, and to create distance between the actions of the Russian government and his own staff. One reason why the Russia investigation is so explosive is that the intelligence community takes it so seriously. The president would surely love to see it downplay the results.

There are many ways to get intelligence to toe the policy line. Direct politicization occurs when they lean on intelligence leaders directly, cajoling them to shape intelligence conclusions in ways that are politically convenient. Indirect politicization, by contrast, occurs when policymakers send subtle signals about what they expect to see and hear. In this case, concerned intelligence officers seem to accuse Trump of what I call “manipulation by appointment.” Rather than twisting the elbows of intelligence chiefs, the idea is to put reliable friends in high places. Critics accused President Reagan of this tactic, for instance, when he appointed his campaign manager William Casey to lead the intelligence community. While pressuring senior officials can lead to political scandal, manipulation by appointment helps avoid that risk.

We can expect to see a few things if Pompeo turns out to be susceptible to White House pressure.

It is unclear that Trump chose Pompeo because he wanted a pliant leader at the CIA. We will not have the whole story for a long time, and episodes of politicization are extremely difficult to categorize. We can expect to see a few things if Pompeo turns out to be susceptible to White House pressure. Most importantly, he will temper his previous assertions about Russian responsibility for the election hack, even if the underlying intelligence remains the same. We will also see efforts to skirt organizational best practices in the CIA. Finally, we will probably see more CIA officials providing specific corroboration about how Pompeo interfered with their work. On the other hand, if Pompeo maintains his integrity, then the investigation will go by the book, and criticisms of the director will be rare and vague.

Nonetheless, there are reasons to be very concerned. Politicization is most likely when the political stakes are very high, and when leaders make public statements on controversial issues that are out of step with intelligence judgments. We are seeing this play out now. Trump’s cavalier attitude about Russian meddling stands in sharp contrast with the intelligence community, and his political future would be in serious doubt if the Russia investigation concludes that there was meaningful collusion between Russia and the Trump campaign. In this hothouse environment, he has every reason to hope that special counsel Robert Mueller’s conclusions point in the other direction.

Mueller’s work depends on support from intelligence and law enforcement. Intercepted communications provided by the National Security Agency and investigative leads from the FBI will surely be central to the case, one way or the other. This is why Trump’s decision to fire FBI Director James Comey was so troubling to observers, some of whom accused the president of obstructing the investigation by removing an official who was insufficiently loyal. Trump may believe that the new director, Christopher Wray, may be easier to manage. Similarly, he may be confident that his long-time political ally Pompeo will help him ride out the Russia probe.

If this is true, the implications are profound and disturbing. Politicization has many negative effects on the quality of intelligence: It can skew findings, inhibit later reassessments, and poison intelligence-policy relations over the long-term.

In this case there is another possible danger. It is obvious that Trump has critics inside the CIA, judging by what anonymous sources have told the press. But there are surely others within the Agency who view him favorably, not least because of his aggressive approach to counterterrorism. Trump seems to favor more aggressive collection, regardless of questions of ethics and effectiveness. He came out in favor of waterboarding, for example, arguing that it is necessary to “fight fire with fire.” Pompeo shares his inclinations. Last year he offered a strong defense of intelligence personnel against accusations that they had gone too far. “These men and women are not torturers,” he said, “they are patriots.” Pompeo’s comments suggest he will err on the side of being more aggressive, a mindset that probably resonates with some officers in the CIA’s Directorate of Operations. The CIA is not a monolith.

The result might be a fracture between the Agency’s collectors and analysts. If many of the former are excited about working under Pompeo, and many of the latter believe he is a mouthpiece for the administration, then the prospects for effective collaboration are slim. The relationship between collection and analysis has always been complicated, and the Agency has invested a great deal of effort in bringing the two disciplines closer together. Most recently, it has reorganized around regional and topical mission centers in part to enhance collaboration. While this initiative is not without critics, there are good reasons to make such interactions routine. Among other things, collectors may overestimate the usefulness of their sources if they lack ready access to analysts who make sense of new information. Conversely, analysts’ work may be incomplete or outdated if they don’t have access to ongoing collection efforts. The same is true regarding covert operations: Plans that sound good in theory but are not backstopped by solid analysis may prove disastrous. Effective intelligence collection relies on a healthy working relationship with analysts. If a split develops as a result of Pompeo and the Russia probe, that working relationship may suffer.

For this reason, among others, we should be very concerned about politicization. Pompeo has a politician’s instincts and close ties to the president. This does not mean he will be politicized, of course, but it has raised suspicions within the CIA. “People have to watch him,” said one official to the Post. “It’s almost as if he can’t resist the impulse to be political.” To overcome these suspicions, and to protect the institutional integrity of the Agency, he should try.

Read the whole story
· · · · · ·

Report: Russia probe creates strife between WH counsel, Trump attorneys – CBS News

1 Share

CBS News
Report: Russia probe creates strife between WH counsel, Trump attorneys
CBS News
The White House counsel and Trump attorneys are reportedly struggling to determine the extent of their cooperation with Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into Russian meddling in the 2016 election and any possible collusion on the part of …
Trump lawyer talked loudly about Russia probe at DC restaurant with reporter nearbyVox
In Russia scandal, Trump’s legal team isn’t a fine-tuned machineMSNBC
Trump’s lawyers are clashing over how to handle the Russia probeBusiness Insider
New York Daily News –AOL –Slate Magazine (blog)
all 73 news articles »
  • 1K